| Typical timeline | 12–18 months |
| Typical cost | $1–3M per migration |
| Failure rate | ~60% miss original timeline |
| Auditor acceptance | Often rejected — manual transformations are not defensibly traceable |
| Security stance | Non-negotiable: data cannot leave their network, cannot use public AI, cannot ship schemas to a SaaS vendor |
Accenture, Deloitte, IBM. Slow, expensive, every project rebuilt from scratch — knowledge walks out the door at the end.
Informatica, Talend. Don't understand GxP, no audit defensibility, no domain knowledge of quality systems.
Veeva-only, capacity-constrained, expensive. Doesn't help non-Veeva targets.
Fast but unauditable. Regulators reject them. Tribal knowledge that doesn't survive turnover.
MAiGRATE installs in the customer's own data center as a Docker appliance. It connects to their legacy quality system on one side and their target system on the other. It uses AI — running on the customer's own AI infrastructure, not ours — to map fields, clean narratives, and resolve terminology. Every transformation is logged in an audit-grade evidence pack that satisfies regulator scrutiny. The customer's data never leaves their network.
Migrations in weeks instead of months. We ship a product, not a project.
Per-record evidence packs that hold up to regulator scrutiny.
Works with multiple sources and multiple targets — Veeva, ServiceNow, SAP, more.
Runs entirely in the customer's network. Their AI tenant. Their identity provider. Their infrastructure. No data ever leaves the building.
| Week 1 | MAiGRATE installed in their on-premise data center. Identity provider wired up. Source and target credentials placed in their secrets vault. |
| Week 2 | Solution engineer configures Customer A: field mappings drafted in a workshop with their QA team. |
| Week 3 | Dry-run on a 500-record sample. Their subject-matter experts review every AI mapping decision. Rules tightened. |
| Weeks 4–6 | Phased migration in 10K-record batches. Each batch produces an evidence pack. Auditors sign off batch by batch. |
| Weeks 1–2 | Same install pattern. MasterControl integration configured. |
| Week 3 | Customer B's configuration loaded — version-chain mapping rules and signature-record handling. |
| Weeks 4–5 | Dry-run, mapping refinement, full migration, evidence pack delivery, sign-off. |
| Week 1 | Same install. TrackWise integration reused exactly as configured for Customer A. |
| Week 2 | ServiceNow GRC integration configured. |
| Week 3 | Customer C's configuration loaded — different target object model, parallel-run mode enabled. |
| Weeks 4–6 | Parallel run begins: every TrackWise change syncs to ServiceNow within 90 seconds. Runs 90 days, then cutover. |
| Resource | Min | Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| vCPU | 8 | 16 |
| RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Disk | 200 GB SSD | 500 GB – 1 TB SSD |
| OS | Linux (Docker host) — RHEL / Ubuntu LTS | |
| Customer VMware / on-premise They already have the host capacity | ~$0 marginal |
| Customer Azure / AWS Equivalent of one mid-size VM + ~500 GB SSD | $300 – $700 / mo |
| Migration window only (3 months) Scale down or decommission after cutover | $900 – $2,100 total |