Three Appliances.
One Engine. One Delivery Model.
Three different pharma pain points. One platform under the hood. Three separately-salable products — and one repeatable delivery model for regulated customers who refuse to put their data in our cloud.
Three appliances, three different buyers, three different revenue streams.
Each appliance targets a distinct regulated-industry problem with a distinct buyer, cadence, and pricing motion. They are independently salable.
| Dimension | MAiGRATE Data Migration | ATR Audit Trail Review | APQR Annual Product Quality Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem solved | Migrate legacy quality data into a modern target system | Continuously review audit trails for GxP compliance | Compile the Annual Product Quality Review regulatory report |
| What it replaces | $1–3M consultancy migration project | Manual quarterly compliance reviews + GRC audit prep | ~1 month of manual work per product, per year |
| Primary buyer | Head of Quality + Migration PM | CISO + Head of Compliance + Internal Audit | Head of Manufacturing Quality · QA Director |
| Data flow | Read source, write target | Read only | Read only |
| Cadence | One-time event | Continuous (weekly / monthly) | Periodic (annual, per product) |
| Source systems | One legacy system (TrackWise, MasterControl, etc.) | One or a few (Veeva Vault, Jira, MES) | Four or more (TrackWise + JMP + ERP + SharePoint) |
| Primary output | Migrated records + per-record evidence pack | Compliance report per cycle with severity-ranked findings | Formal APQR document (Word / PDF) per product |
| Knowledge Graph role | Optional | Central — users, roles, training, SOPs | Load-bearing — product → batch → deviation → CAPA |
| Current pipeline | Vericel · Vantive · Integer Active sales conversations | Vertex · Regeneron Demo engagements | Mankind PoC in preparation |
| ROI story | ~50% cheaper than consultancies; defensible audit trail | Lower cost than quarterly audits; catches what humans miss | 1 month → 1 day. 90% time reduction. |
| Default pricing model | One-time license + services (~$450K–$830K) | Annual subscription per system | Annual subscription per product |
| Sales motion | Project-driven; procurement-heavy | Ops-driven; continuous-compliance narrative | Quality-driven; obvious-ROI narrative |
| Strategic role | Landing wedge — lands the account | First expansion — recurring revenue | Largest expansion — scales with product catalog |
The same deployment model and engagement shape for every appliance.
Regardless of which appliance the customer buys, it runs in their environment, on their network, with their AI, under their identity system. And every engagement follows the same six delivery steps — what changes per customer is the configuration, not the code.
System
System
LLM
Identity Provider
Twelve platform capabilities — inherited from CLAIRE, identical across all three appliances.
These are not per-appliance features. They come from the CLAIRE engine itself. Every appliance we ship inherits all twelve for free. The fourth, fifth, and sixth appliance will too.
| Platform capability | MAiGRATE | ATR | APQR | What it gives you |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Dashboard / Command Center | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Realm-scoped home with activity feed, health indicators, pending approvals, per-entity drilldowns |
| Execution Observability | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Real-time and historical flow execution logs, per-step timing, errors, retries, outputs |
| Full Audit Trail | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Every data mutation logged and traceable to user + timestamp |
| LLM Audit Logger | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Every AI call logged with prompt, response, model, cost, latency — feeds the per-record evidence pack |
| Trend Analysis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Historical charts, period-over-period comparisons, anomaly trending across any metric |
| Web UI / Frontend | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | React app, entity detail pages, wizards, theme, graph visualization — one UI, all three appliances |
| Role-Based Access Control | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Realm-scoped roles (OWNER / ADMIN / WRITER / OPERATOR / READER), per-entity ACLs, runtime enforcement |
| SAML SSO + Identity Provider | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Wires into customer's Azure AD / Okta — same login and offboarding as their other systems |
| Workflow Orchestration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Visual flow builder, human-in-loop gates, conditional branches, error handling, retries |
| Governance Workflow | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Draft → review → approve → publish cascade with version history, dependency graph, impact analysis |
| Human-in-Loop Approval Gates | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Any step in any flow can pause for human review and sign-off before continuing |
| Knowledge Graph + Ontology | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Neo4j-backed, D3 force graph visualization, ontology-driven RBAC on node types |